- Studying Law at Yale
- Our Faculty
Centers & Workshops
- Centers & Workshops
- Paul Tsai China Center
- Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT)
- Cultural Cognition Project
- Global Health Justice Partnership
- Gruber Program for Global Justice and Women’s Rights
- Human Rights Workshop: Current Issues & Events
- Information Society Project
- John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Public Policy
- The Justice Collaboratory
- Abdallah S. Kamel Center for the Study of Islamic Law and Civilization
- Law, Economics & Organization Workshop
- Law, Ethics & Animals Program
- Law School Access Program
- Legal History Forum
- Legal Theory Workshop
- The Arthur Liman Center for Public Interest Law
- Middle East Legal Studies Seminar
- The Oscar M. Ruebhausen Fund
- Orville H. Schell, Jr. Center for International Human Rights
- Robina Foundation Human Rights Fellowship Initiative
- The Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy
- Yale Center for Law and Philosophy
- Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy
- Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges
- Yale Law School Center for the Study of Corporate Law
- Yale Law School Center for Private Law
- Yale Law School Latin American Legal Studies
- Quinnipiac-Yale Dispute Resolution Workshop
- Bert Wasserman Workshop in Law and Finance
- Workshop on Chinese Legal Reform
- Student Life
- Admissions & Financial Aid
- YLS Today
Stephanie Safdi ’13
Human Rights Work With an Environmental Focus
Before she arrived at Yale Law School, Stephanie Safdi ’13 had been living in the south of Israel, working on a Fulbright scholarship with the indigenous Arab Bedouin population. Her work focused on public health issues, many of which happened to be related to environment and property rights.
“I was working in this crossroads of health and the environment and human rights, and when I came here I began investigating those intersections more fully,” she says.
The Schell Center and human rights courses naturally became a home for Safdi, but she also quickly became involved in the Yale Environmental Law Association (YELA) and became increasingly interested in environmental issues.
“I hadn’t had previous academic experience in environmental law or environmental sciences, but I started attending events put on by YELA and at the School of Forestry and I became captivated by this huge umbrella that is environmental law and how it intersects with so many areas that are fascinating to me,” she explains.
At the end of her 2L year she decided to complete a joint degree with Yale’s School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. The joint degree has given her a facility with both science and the law that she hopes will inform her practice in years to come and allow her to approach the field of environmental law in a broader way.
Safdi has also found extracurricular outlets for her interest in environmental law. Realizing that there had been a two-decade hiatus since the Law School had hosted an environmental law conference, Safdi and fellow students organized the first New Directions in Environmental Law conference in 2011.
“It was kind of this beautiful moment where students who were interested in this type of work found a home,” she says. With support from alumnus Kevin Czinger ’87 and the Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, the conference has become an annual event.
Safdi has continued her involvement in human rights work – much of which involves an environmental law angle. She continues to work on behalf of Arab Bedoins facing eviction in the Negev desert and has also traveled to Papua, Indonesia, to examine the impact of biofuel development and plantation farming on the indigenous residents and natural environment of that area. She also worked on a complaint before The World Bank concerning population displacement and pollution caused by World Bank-subsidized coal fired power plants and mining operations.
Safdi clerked in Seattle with Judge Ricardo Martinez in the Western District of Washington. She also worked with Martinez on the progeny of United States v. Washington, a landmark case that affirmed the treaty rights of Washington tribes to fishing resources and, nearly four decades later, continues to elicit disputes over natural resource allocation and habitat conservation.