- Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 12:00PM - 1:30PM
- Open To The Public
- Add to Calendar:
Antitrust cases, including recent complaints filed against dominant technology platforms, have alleged conduct that harms innovation. Section 2 of the Sherman Act is sufficiently broad to address conduct that harms innovation, but courts have little experience adjudicating such allegations. This article briefly reviews the economics literature regarding the effects of market power on innovation incentives. We identify circumstances in which structural conditions warrant a presumption that anticompetitive conduct by a dominant firm is likely to harm or promote innovation and describe various ways in which consideration of likely innovation effects might support finding an antitrust violation or provide a defense of otherwise anticompetitive conduct.
Doug Melamed is Professor of the Practice of Law at Stanford Law School, where he has been a member of the faculty since 2014. From 2009 until 2014, he was Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Intel Corporation and was responsible for overseeing Intel’s legal, government affairs, and corporate affairs departments. Prior to joining Intel in 2009, he was a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of WilmerHale, a global law firm in which he served as a chair of the Antitrust and Competition Practice Group. He joined WilmerHale’s predecessor in 1971. From 1996 to 2001, Doug served in the U.S. Department of Justice as Acting Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division and, before that, as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General. He has written numerous widely-cited articles on antitrust law, patent law, and law and economics. He was the Florence Rogatz Visiting Professor in the Practice of Law at Yale Law School in 2017.
Please contact email@example.com for the link.