John Fabian Witt is the Duffy Class of 1960 Professor of Law and a Professor of History. He is the author of a number of books, including The Radical Fund1: How a Band of Visionaries and a Million Dollars Upended America (forthcoming in October 2025), American Contagions2: Epidemics and the Law from Smallpox to COVID-19 and Lincoln’s Code3: The Laws of War in American History, which was awarded the Bancroft Prize, was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, was selected for the American Bar Association’s Silver Gavel Award, and was a New York Times Notable Book.
Other writings include To Save the Country: A Lost Manuscript of the Civil War Constitution (Yale University Press, 2019) (with Will Smiley), Patriots and Cosmopolitans: Hidden Histories of American Law (Harvard University Press, 2007), and The Accidental Republic: Crippled Workingmen, Destitute Widows, and the Remaking of American Law (Harvard University Press, 2004), as well as articles in the American Historical Review, the Columbia Law Review, the Harvard Law Review, The Yale Law Journal, and other scholarly journals. He has written for The New Republic, The New York Times, Slate, The Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. He has been a John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellow and is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Witt holds a J.D. and a Ph.D. in history from Yale. He served as a law clerk to Judge Pierre N. Leval on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. He taught for a decade at Columbia Law School and has visited at Harvard and the University of Texas at Austin. Witt’s casebooks, Torts and Regulation: Cases, Principles, and Institutions4 (2d ed., 2020) and Torts: Cases, Principles, and Institutions5 (5th ed. 2020) (with Karen Tani), are available for free on a Creative Commons license.
John Fabian Witt ’99 is Allen H. Duffy Class of 1960 Professor of Law at Yale Law School. This commentary discusses Kunal Parker’s book, “The Turn to Process: American Legal, Political, and Economic Thought, 1870–1970.”
For our bicentennial, faculty members reflect on how Yale Law School’s approach to teaching sets the school apart, offering a highly individualized experience for students.
Yale Law School faculty have commented in the media, written op-eds, and submitted amicus briefs in Trump v. Anderson, the case from the Colorado Supreme Court which ordered former President Donald Trump to be excluded from the state’s 2024 presidential primary ballot.
The Program in the Foundations of American Legal Thought takes a closer look at canonical authors and movements in American legal theory past and present, connected to a formal course offered each spring.
Allen H. Duffy Class of 1960 Professor of Law John Fabian Witt ’99 reviews “Settler Empire and the United States: Francis Lieber on the Laws of War” by Helen Kinsella.
The outcome of a case before the U.S. Supreme Court could cause issues for striking workers and courts for years to come, according to an amicus brief co-authored by Professor John Fabian Witt ’99.
“Movement Capture or Movement Strategy? A Critical Race History Exchange on the Beginnings of Brown v. Board,” 31 Yale J. Law & Hum. 520 (March 2021) (with Megan Ming Francis)
“The Partisan Transformation of American Public Health Law, 1918 to 2020,” 111 Am. J. Public Health 411 (March 2021)
“Radical Histories / Liberal Histories in Work Injury Law,” 60 Am. J. Legal Hist. 564 (Dec. 2020)
“The Fourteenth Amendment as an Ending,” 10 Journal of the Civil War Era 5 (2020) (with Lisset Pino)
“Inventing the War Crime: An Internal Theory,” 60 Virginia Journal of International Law 52 (2020) (with Jessica Laird)
“Contract’s Revenge: the Waiver Society and the Death of Tort,” 41 Cardozo Law Review 1265 (2020) (with Ryan Martins & Shannon Price)
“Tort as Private Administration,” 105 Cornell Law Review 1093 (2020) (with Nathaniel Donahue)
“The Czar and the Slaves: Two Puzzles in the History of International Arbitration,” 113 American Journal of International Law 535 (2019) (with Bennet Ostdiek)
“A Lost Theory of American Emergency Constitutionalism,” 36 Law & History Review17 551 (2018)
“Two Humanitarianisms in Ambrose Bierce’s ‘An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge,’” in LaCroix, Masur, Nussbaum & Weinrib eds., Cannons and Codes: Law, Literature, and America’s Wars (Oxford University Press 2021)
“The Law of Salus Populi,” in Meghan O’Rourke ed., A World Out of Reach: Dispatches from Life under Lockdown (Yale University Press, Nov. 2020)
“To Save the Country: Reason and Necessity in Constitutional Emergencies,” in Gary Gerstle & Joel Isaac, eds., States of Exception in American History (University of Chicago Press, October 2020)
“Law, Rights, and the Constitution in the American Civil War,” in Ted Widmer, ed., Disunion: A History of the Civil War32 (Oxford University Press, 2016)
“Two Conceptions of Suffering in War,” in Austin Sarat, ed., Knowing the Suffering of Others34 (University of Alabama, 2014)
"The Secret History of the Chief Justice's Obamacare Decision," in Persily, Metzger, & Morrison eds., The Health Care Case35 (Oxford University Press, 2013)
“The Political Economy of Pain,” in Bernstein & Hulsebosch eds., Making Legal History: Essays in Honor of William E. Nelson (NYU Press, 2013)
"The Social Histories of International Law36," in William Dodge, Michael Ramsay & David Sloss, eds., The U.S. Supreme Court and International Law: Continuity or Change? (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
POPULAR PRESS
“For 100 Years, the Filibuster Has Been Used to Deny Black Rights,” Washington Post, March 18, 2021 (with Magdalene Zier)
“How U.S. Pandemic Restrictions Became a Constitutional Battlefield,” Foreign Affairs, Dec. 31, 2020 (with Kiki Manzur)
“The Wondrous Banality of Democracy,” in The Yale Review, November 2020
“C-Span After Words with Lawrence Gostin,” Oct 26, 2020
“Republican Judges are Quietly Upending Public Health Laws,” New York Times, October 15, 2020
“Why We Don’t Need COVID-19 Immunity Legislation,” Balkinization, Sep. 26, 2020
“The Law of Salus Populi,” Yale Review, March 30, 2020
“Supremely Divided: How the Republican Party Took Over the Supreme Court,” The New Republic, April 7, 2020
"The Achievements and Compromises of Two Reconstruction-Era Amendments," Washington Post, October 31, 2019
“The Shrinking Legacy of a Supreme Court Justice: Why Veneration of Oliver Wendell Holmes is in Decline,” The New Republic, Oct. 2019
“Slouching Back to Calhoun,” Yale Daily News, Sept. 2, 2019
“A Debate over Politics, Principles, and Impeachment–in 1868,” Wash. Post, May 24, 2019
“Elite Colleges Don’t Understand the Business They’re In,” The Atlantic, March 15, 2019
“Trump’s Farcical National Emergency Plan Should Fail – but it Might Not,” Slate, January 8, 2019
“National Emergencies, Then and Now,” Balkinization, January 7, 2019
“The Operative: How John Marshall Built the Supreme Court around His Political Agenda,” The New Republic, January 7, 2019
“Can Chinese Industry Be Made Safe?61,” The Korea Herald, May 8, 2004; The Pakistan Daily Times, May 8, 2004; The Jakarta Post, May 8, 2004; Taipei Times, May 10, 2004; The Singapore Straits Times, May 7, 2004; The Bangkok Post (May 8, 2004)
ENTRIES, SHORT REVIEWS, ETC.
Review of Stacy Pratt McDermott, The Jury in Lincoln’s America (Ohio University Press, 2012), in Journal of American History (2014) 100 (4): 1201-1202
Review of George I. Lovell, Legislative Deferrals: Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2003), in 45 Labor History 390-92 (2004)
Brief of Legal Historians as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent, Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, 2020 WL 416674 (U.S.), January 22, 2020
Brief of Torts Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents in Comcast Corp. v. National Ass'n of African-American Owned Media and Entertainment Studio Networks, 2019 WL 4748379 (U.S.), September 27, 2019
Gill v. Whitford, 137 S.Ct. 2268 (2017), Brief of Historians as Amici Curiae
Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLC, 2016 WL20625507, Brief of Law Professors as Amici Curiae.
Boumediene v. Bush,73 128 S. Ct. 2229 (2008), Brief of Legal Historians as Amici Curiae
Ramroop v. Flex-Craft Printing, Inc., 896 N.E.2d 69 (N.Y. 2008), Brief of New York Labor and Employment Law Professors as Amici Curiae
FAIR v. Rumsfeld,74 547 U.S. 47 (2006), Brief Amici Curiae of 56 Columbia Law School Faculty Members
http://books.google.com/books?id=T-1CBAAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&dq=Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate&pg=PT39#v=onepage&q=Opposing%20Perspectives%20on%20the%20Drone%20Debate&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=7BzzAwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA4&dq=Knowing the Sufferingof Others&pg=PA129#v=onepage&q=Knowing%20the%20Sufferingof%20Others&f=false