National Security

“The only effective restraint upon executive policy and power in the areas of national defense and international affairs may lie in an enlightened citizenry—in an informed and critical public opinion which alone can here protect the values of democratic government.”
New York Times Co. v. United States 403 U.S. 713, 728 (1971)


MFIA represents clients asserting constitutional and statutory rights to information critical to oversight of our nation’s security policies. On behalf of our clients, we have sought access to judicial opinions, regulations, and rules governing communications surveillance, in addition to fighting for limits on the extent to which the recipients of investigative demands may be prevented from discussing the government’s actions with the press and the public. Our current cases include:

MFIA represents the Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges (CGLC), which is seeking information from the U.S. Department of State on unclassified international treaty agreements.

Raymond Bonner and Alex Gibney v. CIA
The Clinic represented investigative journalist Raymond Bonner and documentarian Alex Gibney in a successful effort to vindicate their right to interview a former FBI agent about his first-hand observations of, and opposition to, of the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation” program.

FISC Access Litigation
MFIA and the ACLU are pursuing access to secret judicial opinions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that address the legal authority for surveillance, including the bulk collection of data.

Rosenberg v. Dep't of Defense
MFIA represents prize-winning reporter Carol Rosenberg and the Miami Herald in a FOIA lawsuit against the Department of Defense seeking access to emails sent and received by General John F. Kelly, former Secretary of Homeland Security and current White House Chief of Staff, during General Kelly’s time as commander of the U.S. Southern Command.



For a list of previous matters, please see the MFIA Archive.