Case Disclosed

About this blog

Case Disclosed is a blog written by students, supervising attorneys, directors, alumni, and friends of the Media Freedom & Information Access Clinic.

The views expressed on this blog belong to the author(s) and do not represent the views of Yale Law School or the Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic (MFIA).

[title_1]

Trump and the Toothless Presidential Records Act

March 11, 2019

By Sara Worth '21

An ethics watchdog group is challenging the use of encrypted messaging apps by senior White House officials.

Government Transparency

A Reporter by Any Other Name: Qualifying for Reporter’s Privilege in the Digital Age

February 27, 2019

By Isabel Farhi '19

What makes a reporter a reporter?

The Unreasonableness of "Reasonable" Prepublication Review, Part 1

February 11, 2019

By Katrin Marquez '20

In 1931, the landmark decision Near v. Minnesota established that, as a general matter, prior restraints—“government action[s] that prohibit[] speech or other expression before the speech happens”—are unconstitutional under the First Amendment. As with most First Amendment jurisprudence, the decision recognized that there could be exceptional circumstances in which prior restraints may be allowable, notably in the context of national security.

Data Gathering and the Right to Petition

January 2, 2019

As of the time of writing, the California Spotted Owl, Tricolored Bat, Narrow-foot Hygrotus Diving Beetle, and close to 150 other animal species are awaiting official determinations by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as to whether they qualify as endangered.