In the Press
Tuesday, January 31, 2023Tyre Nichols Case: Does Diversity in Policing Address Police Brutality? ABC News
Monday, January 30, 2023The Latest Crusade to Place Religion Over the Rest of Civil Society — A Commentary by Linda Greenhouse ’78 MSL The New York Times
Monday, January 30, 2023Tyre Nichols Beating Opens a Complex Conversation on Race and Policing The New York Times
Monday, January 30, 2023Ben Crump Applauded ‘Swift Justice’ in Tyre Nichols Killing. Experts Say the Speed Was ‘Unusual.’ USA Today
Tuesday, August 23, 2022
Justice Collaboratory Offers Proposal for Defining Police Authority
Entries in the series are concise, plainly worded, and reflect the latest thinking by leading experts. Models are intended to serve as templates for state and local laws, though their substance may also be incorporated into agency policies, regulations, and guidance.
“Policing in America, perhaps more than any other governmental function, occupies a unique place in the collective consciousness,” the proposal states. “Its triumphs and failings are the subject of daily media coverage, public demonstrations, and political debate at all levels of government, from town halls to the halls of Congress. However, calls for policy changes often fail to result in meaningful action by government officials.”
The first installment of the series focuses on defining state and local police authority. This entry offers a state legislative plan for countering three persistent obstacles to policing policy changes:
- Scattered authority to enact policing policy change.
Changing how policing is administered often requires a patchwork of both local and state action, depending on where the jurisdiction is and what it is trying to achieve, the proposal notes.
- Local reforms hobbled by state preemption.
Even though the administration of policing has historically been a matter of local concern, states “have increasingly interfered with local efforts to revisit policies on departmental budgets, officer headcounts and deployment, and community reinvestment, among other areas,” the proposal notes.
- A poorly defined policing mission.
American police forces are tasked with a wide range of functions that fall under what the proposal calls “an ill-defined and ever-growing public safety mandate.”
Local vs. State Authority
In virtually all states, the power to regulate policing is held simultaneously and with nearly equal breadth by both state and local governments, the Justice Collaboratory has found. However, the Policy Model Series notes, there is little or no coordination of effort between the two levels of government and no common understanding of which issues are best regulated locally or statewide.
“In an ideal system, state and local governments would focus on doing what they are best equipped to do. In other words, state governments would work to enact policies that serve genuine statewide interests and local governments would administer local policing functions in service of their constituency’s priorities and needs. By explicitly defining the roles of both levels of government in regulating policing, achieving this ideal becomes possible,” according to the proposal.
Defining State Authority
The proposal notes that state-level action is critical for setting and enforcing best-practice standards across all areas of policing. Although some states have moved toward strengthening their oversight of policing, an increasing number of states have interfered with local efforts to regulate policing and public safety generally, the Justice Collaboratory has found. This is particularly prevalent when local policies conflict with the platforms of state partisans, the proposal notes. However, when wielded appropriately, state governmental authority can lead to transformative results, it continues. The model envisions an important role for state governments: overseeing all in-state police departments to ensure the uniform adoption of best practices policing.
Defining Local Authority
To protect local democratic governance of policing, the model reasserts local authority over the day-to-day administration of local police departments and shields that authority from politicized state interference. In doing so, the model both defines and protects the role of local governments in regulating policing by instigating important changes to the balance of power between state and local governments.
At its core, the model aligns state law with the common expectation that police department be managed closest to where their services are administered and where grievances against them are pursued: the local level.
The model’s prescription on local authority gives local constituencies a clear understanding of where to direct their efforts when petitioning for reform while protecting the ability of local governments to shape policing to serve their constituencies’ needs.
Although the state would continue to occupy an important role in the regulation of policing, it would be obligated to respect the role of local government in administering policing and situating it within broader local public safety strategies, according to the model proposal.
The Justice Collaboratory
The Justice Collaboratory at Yale Law School is a group of nationally recognized academics, researchers, and social scientists who have joined together to build a more just, effective, and democratic criminal legal system by advancing public policies that are scientifically proven to build strong and safe communities where all citizens can thrive.