In the Press
Wednesday, April 17, 2019What America Can Achieve After Trump — A Commentary by Mira Rapp-Hooper and Rebecca Friedman Lissner Foreign Affairs
Wednesday, April 17, 2019SF City Attorney's Office, Yale Law and Nonprofits Combine for Impact Litigation Guide for Cities Law.com
Tuesday, April 16, 2019Licenses For Undocumented Immigrants Seem To Be Showing Benefits In Connecticut WGBH
Monday, April 15, 2019‘Brick by Brick.’ Ending Mass Incarceration Will Take Concrete Steps at the Local Level News Tribune
Wednesday, May 4, 2016
Professor Ackerman Pens Op-ed After Lawsuit Alleges ISIS War Is Unconstitutional
Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science Bruce Ackerman ’67 has published an op-ed in the New York Times offering support for a newly filed lawsuit that argues President Barack Obama’s war against ISIS is illegal because Congress has not authorized it.
The lawsuit, Smith v. Obama, was filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by Attorney David Remes on behalf of Captain Nathan Michael Smith. Smith is a U.S. Army Captain deployed to the Kuwait headquarters of the Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve, which commands all forces in support of the war against ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Professor Ackerman is collaborating with Remes on the constitutional arguments in the case.
The lawsuit argues that the President and his administration are violating the Constitution by conducting military operations against ISIS in Iraq and Syria without obtaining Congressional authorization per the 1973 War Powers Resolution. In the lawsuit, Smith voices strong support for military action against ISIS, but cites his conscience and his oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Captain Smith is requesting that the court declare whether the war against ISIS in Syria and Iraq violates the War Powers Resolution.