Abja Midha ’05 saw early on as a law student the difference that representation can make to clients in life-changing circumstances. Midha came to law school with a plan to use her legal skills to advance social justice. She got a jump start on that plan her first year, when she joined the Immigration Legal Service clinic and worked on asylum cases.
Being able to enroll in law clinics the second semester of students’ 1L year is a distinguishing feature of Yale Law School, where 90% of students take part in clinical education. Students represent real clients and work on real cases, getting hands-on experience. Clinics take on the toughest cases so that students can find creative ways to push the law, according to Deputy Dean for Experiential Education Fiona Doherty ’99.
Not surprisingly, alumni pursuing pro bono work years later don’t shy away from difficult cases.
“They’re absolutely taking that tradition and taking hard cases that require grit, determination, and sleepless nights,” Doherty said, “and they’re doing it in service of vulnerable people.”
That is true of Dunn, who chose Yale Law School in part because public service is embedded in its culture.
“The school calls upon you to give back and to understand that the reason you are getting your law degree is not just for yourself, but so you can be a leader within your community,” she said.
Dunn was one of the lawyers who litigated the case on behalf of nine pro bono clients against the white supremacists responsible for racially motivated violence at the August 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. Hundreds of white nationalists and neo-Nazis gathered to protest the removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee. But the rally turned violent when white nationalists chanted “Jews will not replace us” and surrounded counter protestors while brandishing tiki torches.
The jury in U.S. District Court found the protesters liable of engaging in conspiracy ahead of the demonstration, among other charges.
The historic verdict that resulted was a rebuke to the white nationalist and neo-Nazi groups named as defendants in the case. For Dunn it was important to do the work on behalf of those victims who suffered physical and emotional injuries but also to make “a larger point that our country and justice system won’t tolerate racially motivated violence.”
Following that case, Dunn and her longtime partner Dan Kramer launched the Paul Weiss Center to Combat Hate in 2024 to continue their work. The center partners with civil rights organizations, clients, and academic institutions to combat white nationalist and other hate-based extremism through the court system and legal advocacy.
Dunn is motivated in her work by the victims she represents. “These were people who were harmed physically and emotionally and traumatized within their own community simply for peacefully standing up against hatred and violence,” she said of the Charlottesville case. “Then they elected, for no certain benefit to themselves, to relive the trauma by testifying in the courtroom. I think we all experienced the verdict through them. In addition to feeling gratified and so much relief, we felt an amount of faith in the justice system that this was the verdict.”
For Greg Silbert ’99, co-head of both the national complex commercial litigation and the appeals and strategic counseling practices at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, his pro bono work brought him a case in which he was responsible for the very life of his client. In his commercial work, Silbert has represented a country in a Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act dispute before the U.S. Supreme Court as well as numerous companies in federal and state courts around the country.
But in the case that Silbert calls his most important professional experience, the stakes were even higher: a man’s life was on the line.
The client was Derrick DeBruce, an Alabama man sentenced to death for his role in a 1991 shooting during a robbery. Silbert represented him as part of a team that included Adam Banks ’08 and other Weil colleagues as well as lawyers from The Legal Aid Society. Weil joined the case as co-counsel when it reached the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
At issue for the appeal was DeBruce’s lawyer during the capital murder trial and sentencing. The appeals team argued that, by calling only one witness, DeBruce’s defense attorney failed to introduce any evidence likely to convince a jury to spare his life. Lawyers who later represented DeBruce called as witnesses family members and medical experts who detailed his upbringing filled with poverty and violence. They described the daily physical and mental abuse he endured from his family, his serious medical issues, and his low-functioning intelligence — details the sentencing jury never heard.
Ultimately, the federal appeals court reversed the sentence because DeBruce’s lawyer failed to provide adequate representation at his sentencing, violating his constitutional rights.
“When we were finally able to call him and tell him that the legal process was completely finished and the state of Alabama would not execute him, that was really an incredible moment,” Silbert said.
Silbert, who also works with organizations including the Innocence Project and Appellate Advocates in his pro bono practice, described working on the case as both meaningful and terrifying.
“You make a lot of judgment calls and you don't know how something’s going to turn out,” Silbert said. “There were definitely some nights that I had trouble sleeping because I didn’t know what was going to happen next.”