In the Press
Thursday, August 15, 2019On Immigration, the Democrats Are Playing Into Trump’s Hands — A Commentary by Peter H. Schuck The New York Times
Thursday, August 15, 2019Five Decisions That May Sway High Court On LGBT Protections Law360
Thursday, August 15, 2019The Supreme Court’s Second Amendment Appetite — A Commentary by Linda Greenhouse ’78 MSL The New York Times
Wednesday, August 14, 2019Obamas, policing, and gun violence Martha’s Vineyard Times
Sunday, January 29, 2017
Yale Law Clinic Secures Victory in Challenge to Refugee and Muslim Ban Executive Order
WIRAC students gather and work through the night on immigration lawsuit challenging the refugee and Muslim ban. Photo Credit: Jessica Hill.
Late in the evening on January 28, 2017, a federal judge in Brooklyn issued a nationwide temporary stay blocking the U.S. government from deporting people pursuant to the Trump Administration’s January 27, 2017 Executive Order.
Recognizing that Trump’s order is likely discriminatory, illegal, and unconstitutional, District Court Judge Ann Donnelly ordered the government not to remove, among others, any “individuals from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen legally authorized to enter the United States.”
This order resulted from an action filed early Saturday morning by the Worker & Immigrant Rights Advocacy Clinic (WIRAC) at Yale Law School and a coalition of leading civil rights’ groups on behalf of a class of people being unlawfully denied entry into the United States. Despite the victory, advocates at airports across the United States continue to report instances of Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) agents intimidating immigrants into leaving the United States, in clear violation of the Court order.
“Judge Donnelly was clear tonight,” said Melissa Z. Marichal '18, Law Student Intern at the Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization (LSO) at Yale Law School. “Intimidating immigrants who are lawfully permitted to enter the United States is in direct violation of the court order.”
The unconstitutionality of the Trump Administration’s actions was also apparent to thousands of Americans who took to the streets to condemn Trump’s Executive Order. Mass actions in support of those detained were organized at airports around the country and at the courthouse in Brooklyn on Saturday.
“The turnout at yesterday’s protests demonstrates that immigrants and refugees are welcome here, no matter what Trump says,” said Will Bloom '17, Law Student Intern at LSO.
The named petitioners in this case, Hameed Khalid Darweesh, an Iraqi husband and father of three, and Haider Sameer Abdulkhaleq Alshawi, an Iraqi husband and father, were detained after arriving at JFK Airport in New York City on January 27. Both had been approved for travel and entry to the United States and were flying with valid documentation. Mr. Darweesh and Mr. Alshawi were both eventually released from custody, and the stay was filed to secure the rights of at least a hundred other individuals who have been detained, held, and—in some cases—returned to their countries of origin nationwide.
This case is being co-counseled by the Worker & Immigrant Rights Advocacy Clinic of the Yale Law School LSO, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Immigration Law Center, the International Refugee Assistance Project, and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP.
For further press inquiries, please contact Jordan Laris Cohen at 858-337-2755, firstname.lastname@example.org.
Read the legal documents here: