In the Press
Monday, September 26, 2022What Meaningful Action Could the United Nations Take To Help Ukraine? NPR
Sunday, September 25, 2022Biden Nixes EPA Action on Climate — A Commentary by E. Donald Elliott ’74 The American Spectator
Sunday, September 25, 2022America's New Secession Movements Aren't a Crime — A Commentary by Stephen L. Carter ’79 The Washington Post
Wednesday, September 21, 2022A Powerful, Forgotten Dissent The New York Review of Books
Tuesday, March 5, 2019
Yochai Benkler on the Role of Technology in the Political Economy
Yochai Benkler at the Seminar in Private Law.
Benkler presented his theory on how technology, institutions and ideology interact to produce economic outcomes. Building on his work on network pragmatism and his contributions to the YLS-based Law and Political Economy Blog, he presented a framework-in-the-making for the analysis of this interplay.
According to Benkler, one should not assume that technology is exogenous to markets, nor that it is deterministic. On the contrary, technology is plastic and will evolve in relationship to the society using it. Similarly, one should refrain from assuming that markets will always produce efficient outcomes, or that the economic outcomes are somehow predetermined. Benkler contested several current theories that suggest phenomena like automation of labor are inevitable or will take a predetermined path.
Many equally plausible future equilibria exist, in Benkler’s view. Which one a given polity will eventually adopt depends on ideology, institutions, shared beliefs and politics. Using automation as an example, he argued that whether a society will move toward a substitution of the workforce by robots, or will complement human labor with machines, is not predetermined but will be affected by complex web of choices and background institutions. The same holds for other technologies and data processing techniques and frameworks.
Right now, according to Benkler, we are in a moment of a social, economic and political upheaval. Economic insecurity is paired with the rise of nationalism and populism from both the left and the right. What this means for the political economy of technology is still an open question. However, we should remember that the reason we are not able to fully foresee the technological future stems exactly from its undetermined character and embeddedness in social institutions.
Each spring, the Seminar in Private Law brings speakers from academia and practice to Yale Law School to present papers addressing a common theme. The 2019 Seminar is devoted to asking how technological change restructures the fundamental concepts and categories of private law. The Seminar is organized by Daniel Markovits, Guido Calabresi Professor of Private Law, and the Yale Law School Center for Private Law, which promotes teaching and research in contracts, property, and torts at Yale Law School and in the broader legal community.