web_0363.jpg

Peter Gruber Challenging Mass Incarceration Clinic

About the Clinic

In the clinic’s seminar, students study the legal, social, and policy factors that contributed to the exponential rise of America’s prison population and consider alternative approaches to punishment. In the field work, students represent clients in two types of cases: federal sentencing proceedings and Connecticut state parole hearings. Students will learn advocacy strategies aimed at mitigating or ameliorating their clients’ punishment, both prospectively during sentencing and retrospectively during post-conviction proceedings.

Students’ work will include:

  • building relationships with clients (some of whom will be incarcerated)
  • interviewing witnesses
  • investigating case facts; developing case theories
  • working on interdisciplinary teams alongside expert witnesses
  • using narrative writing techniques to prepare persuasive pleadings
  • developing reentry plans for clients leaving prison

Additionally, students will present oral arguments at their clients’ federal hearings and will prepare state-sentenced clients to testify before the parole board.

 

Instructors

Miriam Gohara

Kelly M. Barrett

Anjali Pathmanathan

Ways to Engage

LSO Clinic
Our Clinics

Yale Law School offers more than 30 clinics that provide students with hands-on, practical experience in the law on a diverse range of subject matters.

YLS classroom
Simulation

Yale Law School offers a suite of innovative simulation courses based on real-world case studies.

web_0464-6Apromo.jpg
Centers and Workshops

Yale Law School enhances the intellectual life of its academic community by sponsoring a variety of centers, programs, and workshops, inspired by the interests of its faculty and students.

Now it is time to pivot and ask, where are your extraordinary gifts needed? How do you make this legal world that you are entering a better world? One where no one is shut out; one where the weak and vulnerable are not exploited; one that produces fair results based on the merits of the issues before it.