In the Press
Monday, September 24, 2018BU Law Professor Examines Federalism in Affordable Care Act Boston University School of Law
Thursday, September 20, 2018Opioid Bill Lacks Funding To Make Lasting Impact Law360.com
Tuesday, September 18, 2018Academic highlight: Greenhouse and Siegel on the past, present and future of Roe v. Wade ScotusBlog
Monday, September 17, 2018Healthcare groups sue to block Trump's expansion of short-term plans Modern Healthcare
Monday, February 26, 2018
EJC Clinic Client Reacts to NMED Policies
On February 23, NMED released its Public Participation and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) policies that outline the agency's plans to include New Mexican communities in the process for permitting industrial facilities. Citizens for Alternatives to Radioactive Dumping (CARD) and other community groups raised serious concerns about the New Mexico Environment Department's (NMED) failure to include community voices before releasing new policies intended to comply with civil rights laws.
CARD is jointly represented by Yale's Environmental Justice Clinic, Earthjustice, and University of New Mexico's Natural Resources and Environmental Law Clinic.
"While these policies are supposed to be designed to protect communities most directly impacted by the potentially adverse environmental effects of such facilities," Deborah Reade, Research Director for CARD, stated. "NMED closed the door to all public input when drafting these policies."
"After years and years of advocacy, NMED has continued to shut out community groups seeking civil rights enforcement in New Mexico," said Yale Environmental Justice clinic student Ama Francis '18.
In 2005, residents of the mostly Spanish-speaking communities of Chaves County accused NMED of discrimination in its permitting process on the basis of race, color, or national origin by approving the construction of Triassic Park, a hazardous waste facility in their county. The community, through CARD and two other groups, filed a civil rights complaint against NMED for engaging in a statewide pattern and practice of discriminatory permitting, including failing to take proper steps to inform residents with limited-English proficiency of the potential construction of hazardous waste facilities, and the failure to engage them in the public participation process. On January 19, 2017, EPA and NMED signed a Resolution Agreement in which NMED committed to review its nondiscrimination policies and take steps to bring the program into compliance, including completion of the Public Participation and LEP policies released publicly on February 23. The groups that filed the initial complaint, however, were far from satisfied that NMED released the policies without giving communities an opportunity to provide input. Reade stated, "By not allowing community members to provide input on the draft version of the policies, NMED has failed to abide by the spirit of the Resolution Agreement and continues to send the message that public input is not a valuable part of environmental permitting."
"If NMED were willing to start a relationship, we are always ready to respond, co-operate and volunteer our time to defend our lands and people, which we feel the state of New Mexico should be doing in their role if we aspire to be an honest democracy," said Noel Marquez of Alliance for Environmental Strategies in Eddy County.
CARD repeatedly asked NMED to allow community input as it wrote its Public Participation and LEP policies. In an October 30, 2017 letter, CARD formally requested that NMED give CARD and other community groups a chance to comment on the policies before they were finalized.
"The community needs to be involved in shaping the Public Participation and LEP policies," said Reade, "in order to reflect the real needs and concerns of individuals on the ground. Because of the lack of community input, the policies are sadly lacking."
"NMED's actions are inconsistent with commitments they made in the January 2017 Resolution Agreement to address discriminatory practices," stated Lindsay Olsen '19 FES of the Environmental Justice Clinic.
The Resolution Agreement, signed by NMED, states "NMED understands that meaningful public involvement consists of informing, consulting and working with potentially affected and affected communities at various stages of the environmental decision-making process to address their needs. . . Therefore, NMED will ensure its public involvement process is available to all persons regardless of race, color, national origin (including limited-English proficiency), age, disability, and sex."
"Despite this language, NMED made no effort to listen to or incorporate the concerns of community members and local groups most affected by these policies into the policy-making process," Reade continued.
Since the Resolution Agreement was signed, NMED has proceeded with around 200 public processes, and the community groups contend that none of these processes has complied with the provisions of the Agreement. "There is a big disregard of protecting the people of New Mexico," said Marquez.
The groups are also concerned that as a result of NMED's failure to consult with community stakeholders, the new policies come up short. "These new policies need to be revised. For example, the Public Participation policy says that NMED will involve individuals living within four miles of a project site during the permitting process of industrial facilities," said Marquez, "But we on the ground know that pollutants travel by wind and water much farther than a four-mile radius in this area."
The groups also point to the LEP policy, which creates a significant loophole that allows NMED to avoid the requirement to provide language services to people with Limited English Proficiency if such services have a price tag. The LEP policy also suggests that NMED should save costs when implementing its outreach to those with Limited English Proficiency. This admittance of not prioritizing language access as a financial priority sets NMED up to continue in its pattern of discrimination towards non-English speaking individuals.
In addition to CARD, other community groups, including Albuquerque Center for Peace and Justice, Alliance for Environmental Strategies, Los Jardines Institute, and Concerned Citizens of Wagon Mound and Mora County, and Amigos Bravos have also expressed concern about NMED's policies.
CARD is a community-based organization in New Mexico that advocates for the health and welfare of Southeast New Mexico communities and other communities around the State. CARD is represented by Yale's Environmental Justice Clinic, whose work includes cases and advocacy that advance environmental justice, Earthjustice, a national nonprofit environmental law organization, and University of New Mexico's Natural Resources and Environmental Law Clinic.