In the Press
Thursday, May 23, 2019Let’s Not Forget the Establishment Clause — A Commentary by Linda Greenhouse ’78 MSL The New York Times
Wednesday, May 22, 2019Does the Civil Rights Act Protect Gay Employees? The Court Will Decide. The American Prospect
Wednesday, May 22, 2019How A 1925 Law Evolved To Become Crucial For Employers Law360
Tuesday, May 21, 2019Trump's Increasingly Questionable Pardons Should Make Congress Act — A Commentary by Eugene R. Fidell The Hill
Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Yale Team Reaches Semifinals of Jessup Moot Court
Jessup Moot Court members Varun Char ’19, Anirudh Sivaram ’20, Shikha Garg ’19, Professor Harold Hongju Koh, and Srinath Reddy Kethireddy ’19.
Earlier this month, a team of students from Yale Law School reached the semifinals of the International Rounds of the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition in Washington, D.C., the world’s largest moot court competition.
The team comprised Varun Char ’19, Shikha Garg ’19, Srinath Reddy Kethireddy ’19, Anirudh Sivaram ’20, and Gaby Vasquez ’21.
Sivaram was also ranked as the Best Oralist in the Preliminary Rounds, while Kethireddy ranked ninth. Teams from over 90 countries participated in the International Rounds, and over the course of the competition, the Yale team competed against teams from all over the world including Zambia, Italy, Canada, Indonesia, New Zealand and the United States.
Char, Garg, Kethireddy and Sivaram were also members of last year’s team that reached the quarterfinals of the International Rounds. This year, the team qualified for the International Rounds by winning the U.S. regional round in New Orleans, Louisiana. Garg was the Best Oralist in New Orleans, Kethireddy and Sivaram were tied for second, and Char was eighth.
Sivaram said, “In addition to being a moot court competition, for the last two years the Jessup has been a central part of my legal education. This year’s problem forced us to grapple with issues such as state responsibility for corporate action, and balancing environmental protection with public health interests — some of the very same questions that the international community is trying to find answers to.”
The Jessup deals with a fictional dispute between countries before the International Court of Justice, the judicial organ of the United Nations. This year’s problem dealt with issues concerning the responsibility of states for the conduct of corporations, states’ obligations to protect biodiversity and the human rights of indigenous populations, and the appropriate remedy for the uncompensated use of traditional knowledge.