The GHJP has worked for a number of years with a core group of partners in Brazil to carry out a series of research and advocacy activities to address health and human rights issues related to gender, including reproductive health concerns for women impacted by the Zika epidemic, and the implications for human rights and health professional ethics of police reporting requirements in the context of abortion.
In collaboration with the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), the GHJP developed a Technical Note setting out the human rights and ethical obligations put at risk by legal provisions in Brazil requiring health professionals to provide information to law enforcement authorities when patients seek legal abortion following rape. The Technical Note concludes that the risks these police reporting requirements pose to human rights and ethics can be resolved only by ensuring that such requirements do not apply to cases of abortion, or only in very exceptional cases. Human rights and ethical standards underscore the particular risk of involving the criminal legal system in abortion care, even ostensibly to support survivors. Ultimately, removing all preconditions, legal or otherwise, including authorization processes, and instead focusing on providing material support and good-quality, unbiased care, is essential to ensuring real access to legal abortion.
The GHJP and CRR also developed a shorter Ethics Brief, exploring in more detail the professional ethics obligations put at risk for physicians, nurses, social workers, and psychologists who are involved in the authorization process for legal abortion in cases of rape, and therefore exposed to ‘dual loyalty’ conflicts through their simultaneous ethical duties to patients and legal obligations to report to police. The Brief provides recommendations for action for health professionals, professional organizations and collectives, health facilities and hospitals, and Brazil’s Ministry of Health, in order to ensure ethical practice.