- Studying Law at Yale
- Our Faculty
- Centers & Workshops
- Student Life
- Admissions & Financial Aid
- YLS Today
Assessing Law Firms: Culture, Clients, Compensation and Beyond
There are thousands of law firms around the country and the world seeking to hire law students. It is up to you to determine which firm will be a good fit for you. Establish the factors that are important to you in a law firm and then keep them in mind as you go through the process of seeking summer and permanent employment. This section of our site offers you some suggestions for what you may wish to consider when selecting a law firm and mentions resources to help you make an informed decision. YLW’s Top Firms for Gender Equity and Family Friendliness Report is also an excellent resource for assessing firms.
For better or worse, you will spend more time with your work colleagues than with many of your friends and family. It is important that you respect their judgment, enjoy their company and believe that you can learn and develop into a good lawyer under their tutelage. Assess the firm’s “culture.” Is there a sense of collegiality? Are doors in the office open or closed? What is the firm’s attire policy? Are the attorneys of certain political affiliations? How do the attorneys treat the support staff? What opportunities does the firm provide for social and professional interaction among attorneys? Are there committees that embrace associate engagement and focus on the concerns of associates? Consider all of these factors in analyzing the firm’s corporate culture and your fit within that environment.
You can assess a firm’s culture yourself through the interview process, and you can gain insight from students and alumni with knowledge of the firm. Use the following resources to learn more about a firm’s culture:
- Chambers Associate provides associates’ views of the culture of their firms.
- The Vault Guide to the Top 100 Law Firms also shares insight into firm culture. NOTE: you must be on the Yale Network or VPN to access this site.
- The American Lawyer’s annual Midlevel and Summer Associates Surveys assess firms based on associate job satisfaction. This site must be accessed through Yale’s VPN. Instructions are available here.
- Yale Law Student Summer Employment Evaluations available through CDO’s Career Management System.
- Yale Law School’s alumni engagement platform, The Courtyard
The types of clients you work for, the amount of client contact you have, and the types of legal issues confronting those clients can have an enormous impact on your job satisfaction. Some lawyers would prefer to represent individuals, while others wish to work on behalf of large corporate clients. Legal issues addressed by attorneys representing individual clients can include family law, employment, trusts and estates, tax, tort, civil rights, and residential real estate. Attorneys representing corporate clients are more likely to be involved in corporate legal issues, including securities, mergers and acquisitions, environmental law, and commercial real estate.
Different areas of practice require different sets of skills. Do you enjoy analyzing complex statutes and regulations? Then perhaps environmental, telecommunications, or tax law is for you. Would you prefer to have little client contact and instead spend time researching, drafting motions, and arguing in court? Then maybe you should consider appellate law. Take a close look at the work being performed by the junior associates in a particular practice group for a better understanding of what your responsibilities are likely to be. Understand what your skills and interests are and then find a practice area that best fits you. Young associates who are unsure of what practice area is best may benefit from starting with a firm that offers a department rotation system or does not assign associates right away.
Selected resources about law firm practice areas are listed in the Practice Settings section of this site.
Professional development includes firm training opportunities, mentorship offerings, feedback and review processes, promotion practices, and other policies and programs to guide associates in their professional growth. The amount, type and quality of professional development varies from firm to firm. Some firms offer benchmarks for associates at each stage of their careers and assist associates in meeting those goals by ensuring that associates work on a variety of matters with a variety of partners. Find out whether and to what extent associates are involved in firm business matters. Do associates participate in firm committees? Are they involved in recruiting? Do they attend business development meetings? If so, that serves as another indication that the firm is serious about developing its associates into leaders within the firm. Many firms have professional development directors to assist associates in navigating their career paths.
The attorney review process is also an essential part of associate development. Associates are more likely to thrive in settings where their expectations are clearly defined, their performance is periodically evaluated, and they receive regular feedback on their work. Most law firms implement some type of formal and/or informal performance reviews of their associates. Find out how frequently associates are evaluated and whether they are expected to seek feedback on their own or whether partners are expected to review all associates with whom they work.
NALP’s Directory of Legal Employers has a section on Professional Development through which firms can share information about professional development support staff, training and mentorship opportunities, and the levels of partner engagement in these efforts.
A firm’s compensation system can impact the firm’s work environment. Some firms, most famously New York’s Cravath, Swaine & Moore, use a lock-step system, where attorneys in each class year, including partners, receive the same base salary and are typically awarded the same end-of-year bonuses. Recently, as competition for partner talent has increased, some firms have moved away from lock-step to more flexible combination lock-step and merit systems or variable lock-step systems with ranges per class year. For example, in 2020, Davis Polk & Wardwell moved from a pure lock-step system to a modified lock-step compensation structure for its partners. A handful of firms use a pure merit system, in which compensation is based solely on performance. With merit-based systems, firms often consider the number of hours billed, quality of work, pro bono hours, overall contribution to the firm through activities such as recruiting and participation on internal committees, and business development in evaluating associates. Consult firm websites, the NALP Directory under the “Compensation & Benefits” tab and Chambers Associate to learn about a law firm’s compensation structure.
There are varying views as to which system of compensation is better. Firms with lock-step compensation at the partner level may cultivate a culture with less competitiveness and more sharing of time and resources. But while the set lock-step system may minimize competitiveness, it does not reward outstanding performance. Although the merit system compensates star performers, it may create pressure to meet or exceed performance goals at each level. On the other hand, a merit system might allow flexibility for an attorney to receive a lower salary in exchange for working fewer hours. Ask attorneys in firms of interest to you whether and how the compensation structure affects the firm’s work environment. It is also important to understand the partner compensation system because that too can influence a firm’s culture and attitude toward training and mentoring of its associates. For example, in firms that reward partners only for their client billable hours, partners may be less willing to devote time to associate development.
Actual salary levels vary widely among firms depending on their location and size. Some students see the salaries offered by the largest law firms and forget that there are other considerations in assessing employment opportunities. There is no question that large firm salaries are extraordinary, with starting salaries in large firms in New York and California now around $190,000 plus bonus. One issue to keep in mind is that different cities can have vastly different costs of living. Although the NYC salary of $190,000 seems fabulous, it might be surprising to find out that a $190,000 New York City salary is equivalent to $78,645 in Austin, TX and $95,503 in Chicago, IL. Compare the cost of living in different cities with an online salary calculator like this one from CNN Money.
In good economic times, many firms augment associate salaries with end-of-year bonuses. These typically have a merit-based component and may take into account hours billed, quality of work, overall contribution to the firm, business development, and pro bono hours. A handful of firms expressly consider other factors such as community activities and leadership. In addition, some firms offer hiring bonuses to entry-level attorneys who have completed judicial clerkships; the overall compensation package depends on the time credited for the clerkship and the resulting class year in which the attorney is placed. Although it may not be of immediate concern to you, more firms are starting to provide longevity bonuses and sabbaticals to associates who remain with the firm for at least five or six years.
In addition to salaries and bonuses, benefits make up an important part of any compensation package. Click on the “Compensation & Benefits” tab in the NALP Directory to view the benefits offered by firms. Typical benefits include a 401(k) plan, health and dental insurance, family leave, relocation expenses, and long-term disability insurance. Some firms also provide workout facilities, on or off-site childcare, dry cleaning, meals for those working after hours, and more.
First Year Associate Salaries First Year Associate Salary Survey, NALP (2021)
50 or fewer
over 700 lawyers
It is also important to understand that the high salaries of the large firms come at a high price—billable hours. Law firms make money by billing their clients by the hour for their services (litigation contingency fees and other methods of billing do exist, but even associates in these areas must keep track of their billable hours). The more hours billed by the attorneys, the greater the profits for the firm. Attorneys must keep track (usually in six-minute increments) of the time they spend working on each client’s behalf. Some firms provide information about “target,” “expected,” “minimum,” or “average” billable hour requirements for associates on their NALP Directory profile under the “Hours & Work Arrangements” tab. Those figures are typically between 1,800 and 2,500 hours per year. For a detailed description of the toll it takes on your life to bill 1,800 or 2,200 hours per year, see CDO’s The Truth about the Billable Hour advice.
Generally speaking, students who hope to be involved in outside activities, or who simply do not wish to spend so many hours working, should consider working for a smaller firm, in a smaller city, or both. Although salaries for these firms are not as high as those offered by the largest firms, they are still more than enough to live on, and the trade-off in terms of improved lifestyle may be well worth it. In addition, some firms are experimenting with alternative billing structures for associates such as providing more than one billable hour track. Associates can opt for the greater billable hour track thereby receiving more compensation, or they can opt for fewer hours at less pay. Time will tell how these new systems will fare.
Pro bono comes from the Latin “pro bono publico” and means “for the public good.” The ABA defines pro bono legal services as providing legal assistance without expectation of pay to persons of limited means or to organizations in matters addressing the needs of persons with limited means. Most firms view this more broadly to include work for nonprofits and for social causes such as civil rights and the environment. Many students who decide to pursue positions with law firms specifically seek firms that offer meaningful pro bono opportunities.
Firms provide a great deal of information touting their pro bono work. The formats of these programs differ widely, as do the levels of commitment and organization on the part of firms. There are several attributes to look for in assessing a firm’s pro bono program:
- A strongly written pro bono policy with a meaningful and sensible definition of pro bono
- Institutional support and partner role models
- Associate initiative and input into pro bono commitments and firm priorities
- Crediting pro bono hours on the same basis as billable hours
Useful resources include:
- Law firm profiles on the NALP Directory website under the “Pro Bono/Public Interest” tab.
- Chambers Associate, which includes pro bono as a category within each firm’s profile.
- Vault’s Guide to Law Firm Pro Bono Programs and their law firm pro bono rankings.
- The American Lawyer’s annual Pro Bono Survey and Pro Bono Hot List are available through ALM Legal Intelligence under “Surveys, Rankings & Reports”. This site must be accessed through Yale’s VPN. Instructions are available here.
- ABA Law Firm Pro Bono Challenge, which lists firms who have agreed to commit either 3% or 5% of their firm’s total billable hours to pro bono work.
There are many ways to explore pro bono work during the summer, including working for a firm that offers a sponsored split public interest summer. Participating firms allow summer associates to work part of the summer at the firm and the other part at a public interest organization, with the firm paying the entire summer’s salary. If you seek community focused, pro bono friendly firms, you should consider working with a firm that offers a sponsored summer program. See CDO’s brochure, Firms Sponsoring Split Public Interest Summer Programs, for a listing of firms that offer these opportunities.
Law firms struggle to implement policies and practices to attract and retain diverse talent. The 2019 Inclusion Blueprint report provides interesting insights into the inclusion practices and diversity representation at mid-size and large firms. Below are resources to help you learn about the firm efforts firms to increase diversity and how successful those efforts have been.
- The Diversity Lab’s Mansfield Rule certifies that law firms consider at least 30% women, LGBTQ+ and minority lawyers for significant leadership roles. An open letter from firm chairs and managing partners is available here.
- Law Firm Antiracism Alliance Pledge and Signatory List as of 9_04_20
- Some firms offer specific Diversity Summer Opportunities. CDO has information about those opportunities here.
- ALM Intelligence Surveys and Rankings related to diversity (available to students through ALM Intelligence under the Surveys, Rankings & Reports tab). This site must be accessed through Yale’s VPN. Instructions are available here. Includes the Diversity Scorecard with detailed information on minority legal staffing levels at NLJ 250 and Am Law 200 firms; the Am Law 200 Women in Leadership survey; the NLJ LGBT Scorecard and more.
- Vault’s list of the “Best Law Firms for Diversity” and separate lists for women, racial minorities, LGBTQ, and individuals with disabilities. These lists are available online by clicking ”Law Firms” under the “Research Companies” tab.
- Use Vault and the Minority Corporate Counsel Association’s Law Firm Diversity Database to learn more about the hiring, leadership and attrition of diverse attorneys at law firms.
- Chambers Associate provides information on diversity in its firm descriptions and also provides a chart of leading law firms for D&I culture.
- NALP’s Diversity Best Practices Guide provides best practices for diversity in the areas of leadership; retention, culture, and inclusion; professional development; and recruitment. The guide also shares information about specific law firm diversity initiatives.
- Through analysis of data on recent graduates, NALP provides information on a variety of diversity and demographic topics in the Research & Statistics section of its website.
- Through the NALP directory, you can access demographic information on firms and read descriptions of their diversity recruitment and retention efforts.
- Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Index which rates workplaces, including law firms, on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer equality.
Sometimes simply looking at a firm’s website will give you insight into their diversity efforts. For example, many firms include a specific section on diversity, which may highlight the firm’s recruiting efforts, provide its non-discrimination policy, and describe its support of diverse law students and attorneys. Find out whether diverse attorneys are members of the law firm’s leadership. When scheduling callback interviews, ask to meet with diverse attorneys. Ask them how the firm supports an open and affirming environment for all lawyers.
How firms deal with work/life balance issues is often an important consideration for students. One way to assess a law firm’s efforts is to learn about their parental leave and flexible work policies including remote work options. Keep in mind that while most large firms have written policies in place, many smaller firms handle these issues just as well, but on a more ad hoc basis. In addition, remember that work life/balance policies are meaningless if the firm either implicitly or explicitly discourages attorneys from utilizing them.
Most large firms have written parental leave policies that include coverage of adoptions and children of domestic partners. In addition to offering leave, some firms provide a stipend to defray the cost of adoption. Firms may base their policies on gender or the attorney’s status as primary caretaker. Find out whether a non-primary caretaker is eligible for leave. Beyond learning the specifics of the firm’s leave policy, find out what effect, if any, taking a leave has on advancement in the firm. Inquire whether attorneys who have taken a leave have continued to progress on the partnership track and/or have gone on to make partner.
Typical types of flexible work options offered by firms include part-time, remote work, flex-time, and job sharing. Of the firms that offer these options, almost all allow them for attorneys with family obligations (children, spouses, or dependent parents); fewer firms allow attorneys to exercise these options for personal reasons. Firms may restrict the availability of an alternative work arrangement to attorneys who have worked at the firm for a specified amount of time (often one year). In some firms, certain practice groups are more amenable to attorneys working an alternative schedule than other groups. Some firms require that a part-time attorney work a certain percentage of hours of a full-time attorney (often 60%). If the attorney exceeds his/her agreed upon hours, some firms compensate the attorney with additional time off, some provide a salary adjustment, and others add that factor when considering end of year bonuses. A few firms limit offers of partnership to full-time attorneys.
In response to COVID-19, employers are now facing new decisions about return-to-work plans for attorneys and staff. Keep an eye out for how firms of interest to you handle these matters.
Useful resources include:
- YLW’s 2021 Top Firms for Gender Equity and Family Friendliness report
- Working Mother Media Best Law Firms for Women List.
- NALP Directory provides information in each firm’s profile, in the “Hours & Work Arrangements” tab, regarding alternative work options and non-traditional track attorneys.
- The Center for Work/Life Law at UC Hastings has a variety of resources on work/life balance.
While you may or may not intend to remain at a firm through partnership, it is still important to understand the partnership process and structure at firms. Traditionally, law firms had only one type of partner—an equity partner who shared in the profits of the firm. Now, many firms have two or more tiers of partnership. Some have non-equity partners who do not share in the profits of the firm and are not the firm decision-makers, in addition to equity partners. Also, the number of years it takes to make non-equity or equity partner varies from firm to firm. Find out what that is. Some firms will hire lateral partners while other firms tend to promote only from within. The NALP Directory provides partnership track information under the “Partnership and Advancement” tab. NALP has also authored The Emergence of Nontraditional-Track Lawyer Career Paths:A Resource Guide for Law Firms and Law Schools.
As has been referenced above, law firms are ranked in a whole host of ways. Through ALM Intelligence, you have access to surveys, lists and rankings including The AmLaw 100 and 200; the law firm “A-List”; the Midlevel Associates Survey; and the Summer Associates Survey, just to name a few. Vault also provides various rankings (available through the Vault Online Library) including the Top 100 Law Firms; The Best 20 Firms to Work For; regional rankings; diversity rankings and more. (ALM and Vault must be accessed through Yale’s VPN. Instructions are available here.) Chambers USA ranks firms by practice area. While these rankings may provide you with some guidance in determining which firm is right for you, it is critical that you have some understanding of the universe of employers being ranked (typically only the largest law firms); the criteria used to create the ranking (subjective attorney opinions or objective data); and the agenda of the publisher (if any). Use rankings as one source of information about potential employers, but do not assume that just because a firm ranks well that it will be right for you.
Some students start their law firm research by gauging the relative “prestige” of law firms, and then aim to work at the most “prestigious” firm they can find. The problem with that approach is that as with beauty, prestige is in the eye of the beholder. Simply because a firm ranks #1 on the AmLaw 100 list (for example), does not necessarily make it a better place for YOU to work than a firm that isn’t even on the list. If you want to maximize your chances of securing employment with a law firm best suited to your personality, work style, and practice interests, you cannot cut corners by relying on someone else’s definition of prestige.
For some students, an important factor in selecting a law firm is what opportunities that position will afford them if they decide it is time to move on. Regardless of the transition you seek to make, there are certain factors you should keep in mind as you chart your career path. Review CDO’s advice on Maximizing your Time in Big Law. Use our alumni engagement platform, The Courtyard, to view the varied career paths of our graduates. In addition, many firms devote a section of their websites to their “alumni,” depicting the career paths of attorneys who have left their firms for other opportunities.
If you have a particular transition in mind, take advantage of every opportunity to learn about and connect with people in that field. Consider pro bono opportunities, bar association events and committees, community offerings, and any and all networking opportunities. Avoid the golden handcuffs—live within a tight budget knowing that once you make a transition, your big firm salary may be a thing of the past.
A special note if you are contemplating a career in legal academia -- there are many factors that will be significantly more important to your candidacy than the type of law firm where you work after completing law school. These factors include publications, judicial clerkship experience, additional advanced degrees, and recommendations. In fact, while several years of practice experience is generally an asset in the law teaching market, candidates with four or more years often face more challenges on the market. For additional information about law teaching, visit the Law Teaching section of CDO’s website.
Selecting a law firm that best fits your career goals and lifestyle can be very challenging. In addition to reviewing the resources mentioned here, use the interview process to learn more about a particular firm’s policies. Check out the interviewing advice on the CDO site and the VIP site.
Deciding when to ask questions about certain matters can be tricky. Remember that Yale law students have considerable power in the job market. If you ask questions about issues such as pro bono, flexible work, and quality of life issues, firms will have to come up with answers and may decide to implement policy changes. At the same time, your goal in the interview is to demonstrate your interest in the work of the firm and your work ethic, so it would be wise to ask these questions as a small portion of the universe of questions you pose. You may decide to ask some of the questions that are more important to your decision-making earlier in the interview process, and save other questions for after you have an offer in hand.
-Last updated June 2021