- Paul Tsai China Center
- Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT)
- Cultural Cognition Project
- Global Health Justice Partnership
- Gruber Program for Global Justice and Women’s Rights
- Human Rights Workshop: Current Issues & Events
- Information Society Project
- John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Public Policy
- Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges
- Yale Law School Center for the Study of Corporate Law
- Yale Law School Center for Private Law
- Yale Law School Latin American Legal Studies
- Quinnipiac-Yale Dispute Resolution Workshop
- Bert Wasserman Workshop in Law and Finance
- Workshop on Chinese Legal Reform
- Studying Law at Yale
- Our Faculty
-
Centers & Workshops
- back
- Centers & Workshops
- Paul Tsai China Center
- Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT)
- Cultural Cognition Project
- Global Health Justice Partnership
- Gruber Program for Global Justice and Women’s Rights
- Human Rights Workshop: Current Issues & Events
- Information Society Project
- John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Public Policy
- The Justice Collaboratory
- Abdallah S. Kamel Center for the Study of Islamic Law and Civilization
- Law, Economics & Organization Workshop
- Law, Ethics & Animals Program
- Law School Access Program
- Legal History Forum
- Legal Theory Workshop
- The Arthur Liman Center for Public Interest Law
- Middle East Legal Studies Seminar
- The Oscar M. Ruebhausen Fund
- Orville H. Schell, Jr. Center for International Human Rights
- Robina Foundation Human Rights Fellowship Initiative
- The Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy
- Yale Center for Law and Philosophy
- Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy
- Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges
- Yale Law School Center for the Study of Corporate Law
- Yale Law School Center for Private Law
- Yale Law School Latin American Legal Studies
- Quinnipiac-Yale Dispute Resolution Workshop
- Bert Wasserman Workshop in Law and Finance
- Workshop on Chinese Legal Reform
- Student Life
- Admissions & Financial Aid
- YLS Today
In re Trotman
Veterans Legal Services Clinic
- NVLSP, VLSC White Paper: Veterans Who served on Guam ’62-75 Likely Exposed to Dioxin Herbicides
- C-123 Veterans Association
- Camp Lejeune Water Contamination
- Cardona v. Shinseki
- CT MOS Task Force
- Connecticut Veterans Legal Center
- Connecticut Veterans Legal Center Military Service Academies
- Cowles v. McHugh
- Dolphin v. McHugh
- Forms & Resources for Veterans Seeking Discharge Upgrade
- Giammarco v. Johnson
- IAVA-CT State Benefits Advocacy for Veterans with Bad Paper
- IAVA-CT: Protecting Veterans with Bad Paper from Employment Discrimination
- In re Trotman
- In re Venter
- Robert M. Cover Fellowship in the Veterans Legal Services Clinic
- Kennedy v. McCarthy
- Manker v. Spencer
- Military Sexual Trauma Rulemaking & Litigation
- Monk v. Mabus
- Monk v. Wilkie
- Palomares FOIA Litigation
- Petition for Rulemaking to Change VA Motto
- POD + CVLC MST FOIA Litigation
- POD+CVLC VA Bias FOIA Litigation
- Reid v. Donelan/In re Reid
- Reports and Manuals
- Service Women’s Action Network MST FOIA
- Service Woman’s Action Network Military Service Academies
- Shepherd v. McHugh
- Skaar v. Wilkie Class Palomares Action
- Spires v. James
- Terwilliger v. Cook
- The Campaign for a Presidential Pardon: Justice for Veterans with Bad Paper and Mental Illness
- Veterans Advocates Demand Release of Incarcerated Veterans Amid COVID-19
- Veterans Education Success
- VVA and NVCLR v. DOD – PTSD Upgrade FOIA Suit
- VVA-Personality/Adjustment Disorder
- VVA-PTSD Discharge Upgrades
Gene Trotman served in the Air Force in the 1970s, where he developed Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after an in-service experience of personal assault. Since leaving the Air Force, Mr. Trotman has battled substance abuse, been in and out of intensive treatment services, experienced the disintegration of two marriages, and struggled to maintain employment. In 1991, he applied for disability benefits for a nervous condition and mild depression, at a time when PTSD was not commonly recognized as a medical condition. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rejected his claim and dismissed his appeal. In 2001, Mr. Trotman applied again for VA benefits, on the explicit ground that he suffered PTSD attributable to his military service. The VA rejected his claim again, and Mr. Trotman embarked on ten years of appeals. Throughout the time that he was seeking VA recognition of his disability, Mr. Trotman was also receiving treatment for PTSD from the local VA hospital.

In fall 2011, Mr. Trotman retained the Veterans Legal Services Clinic. The clinic worked with Mr. Trotman to develop crucial evidence, including affidavits from friends, family, and Mr. Trotman himself, and an expert evaluation by a Yale Forensic Psychiatrist Fellow. The clinic also combed through Mr. Trotman’s extensive VA files, including medical history and his discharge papers, to identify consistent VA diagnoses of PTSD, as well as to document a symptomatic profile consistent with the description of the disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. This evidence was then submitted with detailed briefing demonstrating that the VA had misapplied its own legal standards to Mr. Trotman. Correcting two decades of erroneous rulings, in July 2012, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) recognized that Mr. Trotman’s PTSD is attributable to his military service and granted his application for disability benefits. Mr. Trotman then waited seven more months for the VA Regional Office to issue a disability ratings decision, after which he finally received a check for more than $78,000—back payment for the benefits he would have received during the years his application was pending.