- Paul Tsai China Center
- Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT)
- Cultural Cognition Project
- Global Health Justice Partnership
- Gruber Program for Global Justice and Women’s Rights
- Human Rights Workshop: Current Issues & Events
- Information Society Project
- John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Public Policy
- Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges
- Yale Law School Center for the Study of Corporate Law
- Yale Law School Center for Private Law
- Yale Law School Latin American Legal Studies
- Quinnipiac-Yale Dispute Resolution Workshop
- Bert Wasserman Workshop in Law and Finance
- Workshop on Chinese Legal Reform
- Studying Law at Yale
- Our Faculty
-
Centers & Workshops
- back
- Centers & Workshops
- Paul Tsai China Center
- Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT)
- Cultural Cognition Project
- Global Health Justice Partnership
- Gruber Program for Global Justice and Women’s Rights
- Human Rights Workshop: Current Issues & Events
- Information Society Project
- John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Public Policy
- The Justice Collaboratory
- Abdallah S. Kamel Center for the Study of Islamic Law and Civilization
- Law, Economics & Organization Workshop
- Law, Ethics & Animals Program
- Law School Access Program
- Legal History Forum
- Legal Theory Workshop
- The Arthur Liman Center for Public Interest Law
- Middle East Legal Studies Seminar
- The Oscar M. Ruebhausen Fund
- Orville H. Schell, Jr. Center for International Human Rights
- Robina Foundation Human Rights Fellowship Initiative
- The Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy
- Yale Center for Law and Philosophy
- Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy
- Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges
- Yale Law School Center for the Study of Corporate Law
- Yale Law School Center for Private Law
- Yale Law School Latin American Legal Studies
- Quinnipiac-Yale Dispute Resolution Workshop
- Bert Wasserman Workshop in Law and Finance
- Workshop on Chinese Legal Reform
- Student Life
- Admissions & Financial Aid
- YLS Today
POD + CVLC MST FOIA Litigation
Veterans Legal Services Clinic
- NVLSP, VLSC White Paper: Veterans Who served on Guam ’62-75 Likely Exposed to Dioxin Herbicides
- C-123 Veterans Association
- Camp Lejeune Water Contamination
- Cardona v. Shinseki
- CT MOS Task Force
- Connecticut Veterans Legal Center
- Connecticut Veterans Legal Center Military Service Academies
- Cowles v. McHugh
- Dolphin v. McHugh
- Forms & Resources for Veterans Seeking Discharge Upgrade
- Giammarco v. Johnson
- IAVA-CT State Benefits Advocacy for Veterans with Bad Paper
- IAVA-CT: Protecting Veterans with Bad Paper from Employment Discrimination
- In re Trotman
- In re Venter
- Robert M. Cover Fellowship in the Veterans Legal Services Clinic
- Kennedy v. McCarthy
- Manker v. Spencer
- Military Sexual Trauma Rulemaking & Litigation
- Monk v. Mabus
- Monk v. Wilkie
- Palomares FOIA Litigation
- Petition for Rulemaking to Change VA Motto
- POD + CVLC MST FOIA Litigation
- POD+CVLC VA Bias FOIA Litigation
- Reid v. Donelan/In re Reid
- Reports and Manuals
- Service Women’s Action Network MST FOIA
- Service Woman’s Action Network Military Service Academies
- Shepherd v. McHugh
- Skaar v. Wilkie Class Palomares Action
- Spires v. James
- Terwilliger v. Cook
- The Campaign for a Presidential Pardon: Justice for Veterans with Bad Paper and Mental Illness
- Veterans Advocates Demand Release of Incarcerated Veterans Amid COVID-19
- Veterans Education Success
- VVA and NVCLR v. DOD – PTSD Upgrade FOIA Suit
- VVA-Personality/Adjustment Disorder
- VVA-PTSD Discharge Upgrades
- Home
- Studying Law at Yale
- Clinical and Experiential Learning
- Our Clinics
- Veterans Legal Services Clinic
- POD + CVLC MST FOIA Litigation
On December 13, 2017, Protect Our Defenders (POD) and the Connecticut Veterans Legal Center (CVLC) filed suit in U.S. District Court to compel the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security to release records related to gender disparities within the military justice system, and to the military record correction boards’ handling of cases involving sexual assault and harassment. Read the complaint in Protect Our Defenders et al. v. Department of Defense et al. here.
Discrimination against female service members is widespread: women are dramatically underrepresented within the military and experience disproportionate rates of sexual harassment, assault, and rape (collectively known as “military sexual trauma” or “MST”). Service members who have experienced MST are at increased risk of involvement with the military justice system, and individuals who report MST experience high rates of retaliation that can end their careers.
Despite public outcry, the military has resisted efforts to end the epidemic of sexual assault and retaliation in its ranks, including those from Congress. Accordingly, POD and CVLC submitted Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests in the summer of 2017 related to: (1) the Boards of Correction of Military Records’ (BCMRs’) adherence to the Military Whistleblower Protection Act; (2) the prosecution of sexual assault cases in the military justice system; (3) the BCMRs’ disposition of applications with sexual assault elements; and (4) gender disparities in the disposition of claims before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, including those with sexual assault elements.
To date, the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs still have not responded to many of POD and CVLC’s requests. However, the few responses received show, for example, that the Navy has failed to collect any data on whether it is complying with a 2015 Congressional mandate requiring that victims of MST have access to civilian prosecutors. Additional data and documents received are posted below.
Complaint: Protect Our Defenders et al. v. Department of Defense et al., 3:17-cv-02073 (D. Conn.)
Press Clippings:
Dianna Cahn, Nonprofit Group Sues DoD over Requests for Sexual Assault Data, Stars & Stripes, December 13, 2017
Diane Orson, Military Facing Scrutiny for Handling of Sexual Assault and Harassment Complaints, WNPR, January 3, 2017
Kyle Rempfer, Veterans Groups Sue the Military for Sexual Assault Records, Military Times, December 16, 2017
Documents Received to Date
Army
July 14 Requests
- Top 10 Specifications (Charges) Arraigned, General and Special Courts-Martial, 2007 – 2017
- General and Special Courts-Martial Arraigned in Iraq or Afghanistan, 2002 – 2017
- List of General and Special Courts-Martial Arraigned in Iraq or Afghanistan, 2002 – 2017
- Convening Authorities of Referred Courts-Martial, 2014 - 2017
Air Force
July 6 Requests
- Sample of AFBCMR cases related to sexual assault and/or to Military Whistleblower Protection Act (MWPA) claims
- Instruction letter to AFBCMR panel regarding the MWPA (sample)
- Memorandum requesting an Inspector General investigation of a MWPA claim (sample)
- Recommendation for disciplinary action for an MWPA charge (sample)
- AFBCMR Record of Proceedings of MWPA case (sample)
- Staff Summary Sheet for MWPA charge (sample)
Navy
July 6 Requests
- Jan. 2015 MWPA Memorandum to BCNR
- May 2016 MWPA reminder to BCNR
- 2012 Notes on GAO Final Report on Whistleblower Protection Improvements
- History of MWPA and Statute Prohibiting the Use of Mental Health Evaluations in Reprisal
- Memorandum of agreement between the BCNR and Navy and Marine Inspector Generals for reporting results of reprisal investigations, April 2, 2012
- Records from DoDIG Administrative Investigations Training Symposium, Oct. 13, 2015
- MWPA cases before the BCNR
- Data on MWPA cases before the BCNR
- MWPA Complaint FAQ
Marine Corps
July 14 Requests