- Studying Law at Yale
- Our Faculty
Centers & Workshops
- Centers & Workshops
- Paul Tsai China Center
- Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT)
- Cultural Cognition Project
- Global Health Justice Partnership
- Gruber Program for Global Justice and Women’s Rights
- Human Rights Workshop: Current Issues & Events
- Information Society Project
- John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Public Policy
- The Justice Collaboratory
- Abdallah S. Kamel Center for the Study of Islamic Law and Civilization
- Law, Economics & Organization Workshop
- Law, Ethics & Animals Program
- Law School Access Program
- Legal History Forum
- Legal Theory Workshop
- The Arthur Liman Center for Public Interest Law
- Middle East Legal Studies Seminar
- The Oscar M. Ruebhausen Fund
- Orville H. Schell, Jr. Center for International Human Rights
- Robina Foundation Human Rights Fellowship Initiative
- The Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy
- Yale Center for Law and Philosophy
- Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy
- Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges
- Yale Law School Center for the Study of Corporate Law
- Yale Law School Center for Private Law
- Yale Law School Latin American Legal Studies
- Quinnipiac-Yale Dispute Resolution Workshop
- Bert Wasserman Workshop in Law and Finance
- Workshop on Chinese Legal Reform
- Student Life
- Admissions & Financial Aid
- YLS Today
Skaar v. Wilkie Palomares Class Action
On January 17, 1966, two U.S. Air Force planes collided over Palomares, Spain. The collision dislodged four hydrogen bombs, which fell to the earth and released clouds of radioactive dust over the Spanish countryside. The Air Force sent approximately 1,600 airmen to Palomares to clean up the accident’s aftermath. The radiation at Palomares poisoned many of the airmen, and caused them to suffer a broad range of health defects in the ensuing decades.
The Veterans Legal Services Clinic (VLSC) represents retired Air Force Chief Master Sergeant Victor Skaar, a veteran of the Palomares clean-up, as he appeals the Board of Veterans’ Appeals denial of his disability benefits claim before the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC). Mr. Skaar challenges VA policies on behalf of a proposed class of Palomares veterans, contending that the VA has unlawfully refused to recognize Palomares as a “radiation-risk activity,” and has unlawfully relied on flawed scientific methodology to deny Palomares veterans’ disability benefits claims.
In a groundbreaking 6-3 decision issued on December 6, 2019, the CAVC sitting en banc certified a class of elderly disabled veterans exposed to ionizing radiation while cleaning up the 1966 nuclear bomb disaster in Palomares, Spain. The CAVC’s decision held that the group of Palomares veterans satisfied the requirements for class certification used in other federal courts, announcing that the "decision today heralds the beginning of an era in which we will entertain, but by no means always certify, class actions in the first instance, making us the only Federal appellate court in the Nation to do so." This class action is the first ever certified in the history of the CAVC from a direct appeal from the VA benefits system, and the first ever certified by the en banc Court. The CAVC also ordered notice to be provided to potential class members.
On September 2, 2020, the CAVC heard oral argument on this case. The argument concerned the methodology the VA usues in determining class members' eligibility for disability benefits for Palomares radiation-related conditions. It is unknown on what date the Court will issue its decision.
Resources for Palomares Veterans Pursuing Benefits Claims and Appeals
VLSC, as counsel for the class in Skaar v Wilkie, drafted a letter and collected documents for veterans who served at Palomares, Spain in 1966 to submit to the VA (either Regional Office or the Board of Veterans' Appeals) in support of any service-connected disability claims for radiation-related conditions. The packet includes relevant selections from the evidence filed as part of the class action lawsuit. This evidence establishes that the VA's current methodology for deciding Palomares veterans' claims for service connection for radiation-related conditions is flawed.
This letter with attachments is not legal advice. VLSC does not represent class members in their individual claims and expresses no opinion as to the merits of a person’s individual claim or as to a person’s membership in the class.
Selected Case Documents
Selected Media Clips
Richard Currey, The Palomares Nuclear Disaster and a Class-Action Victory, The VVA Veteran, March/April 2020.
Chloe Shantz-Hilkes and John McGill, U.S. Veteran Sues Military Half-Century After Classified Cold War Disaster, CBC Radio, February 14, 2020.
Dave Philipps, Legal Win Is Too Late for Many Who Got Cancer After Nuclear Clean-Up, New York Times, February 11, 2020.
Court Orders Disclosure of Information About Veterans Exposed to Radiation, Yale Law School News, November 14, 2018.
Rance Burger and Sydni Moore, Federal court hears case of Nixa veteran who worked “Broken Arrow” cleanup in 1966, Christian County Headliner News, October 17, 2018.
Leo Shane III, Lawmaker presses for quicker action to help military clean-up crews of 1966 nuclear accident, Military Times, August 29, 2018.
Joan Faus, Half a century after Palomares nuclear accident, a glimpse of justice, El País, January 3, 2018 (versión en español aquí).
Julia Bergman, Air Force vet who was part of 1966 nuclear cleanup seeks class action lawsuit, The Day, December 11, 2017.